Skip to main content

We're forgetting how to sell

I’ve just returned from a conference in Rome where I listened to a procession of impassioned CRM managers from car companies telling an audience of CRM managers about their latest marketing initiative to increase sales and keep customers loyal. All made good sense. All faced similar challenges – legacy IT; recalcitrant dealers; experimentation in new media channels; no money; harsh market conditions (ie no-one’s buying cars these days). But many of them missed arguably the single most important factor which will affect their figures – Selling!

Marketing people, and increasingly their sales colleagues along with top management, believe that it’s all about giving the customer what they want, when they want it. Seems logical and sensible. But it‘s only half the story. Sure every business has to do that, and better than their competitors. Sure we need to make the processes involved in attracting prospects, responding to any interest they express, and achieving a happy sale for both parties as comfortable as possible. But by leaving the decision making at every step down to the customer alone, without attempting to coerce them into making a decision, we’re turning businesses into little more than order takers. Not much better than websites. Businesses need to be proactive as well as competently reactive. They need to rediscover the art and science of Selling and not leave the sales process down to crossing fingers and hoping they’ve done enough to encourage people to buy their products.

The job of a salesman (and woman of course) is to Qualify the Customer; Counter Objections; and Close the Sale. Every sales course in the world teaches salesmen the techniques involved in each of these steps. But I didn’t hear one speaker at this CRM conference mention putting the prospect (ie not a customer yet) under any pressure to buy. It was all about making them feel good about the brand. Giving them everything they needed to make a decision. Trying to predict their needs and offering them inducements. But always leaving the buying decisions entirely down to the prospect. ‘Don’t upset the customer’ was the mantra. Of course you mustn’t upset them, but there’s nothing in the rule book of business that says you shouldn’t put them under pressure. Are marketing people these days getting soft? Are they afraid of asking for business? Are social networks, for example, making everyone scared of being branded ‘pushy’?

The hardest thing in the world is to liberate Pounds, Euros and Dollars from people’s bank accounts – especially these days. If somebody doesn’t really need to buy something, particularly something as expensive as a car, they will procrastinate and delay the painful decision to release their hard earned money for as long as the sensible side of their brain prevails. Because in the final analysis, we probably don’t really need to buy all those things we do buy. We can get by, usually, on what we’ve already got or on something cheaper. But human nature seeks pleasure. And owning something new or better is a pleasure. Like the old adage about boats: The two happiest days of your life, the day you buy it, and the day you sell it! So the indulgent side of our brains needs to be stimulated – which is where good salesmanship has to play its part. It’s not hard to persuade someone that buying a new car is going to give pleasure. The problem is that we naturally resist temptations, especially expensive ones, so it’s the job of the salesman to maximise desire (through careful Qualification) whilst helping the buyer to overcome their natural resistance (by Countering Objections), and coercing them into signing the order (Closing the Sale). Each of those steps needs encouragement for the process to happen at all… and for it to happen as fast as possible.

The US and the UK are sometimes regarded as a sophisticated markets for car sales in comparison with most other European countries. One of the reasons for this is that the average period in the UK and US before a customer changes a car is around 3 years. In most European markets it’s 6 or even 10 years. Clearly there’s little difference between markets in the appeal of a new car. They all use broadly the same marketing techniques, and finance schemes are now universal. My view is that one of the key differences between those markets is an appetite for selling. Proactive hard work by skilled salesmen and women (indeed women typically outsell their male colleagues in the same dealership) will make a huge difference. Not letting a prospect off the hook is clearly key.

A question my company 10ACT is often asked after presentations of our TrackBack product (which measures the speed of lead follow-up by phone) is “Aren’t you putting pressure on the customer?”. Damn right we are. If you leave it up to them, and them alone to make that buying decision, they’ll either not bother or will make it when they get around to prioritising it. Worse still, they might be persuaded by a hungrier competitor. A call from a salesman will not only move the buying decision to the front of their mind, if handled efficiently it might actually result in a visit to a showroom and a sale. So don’t leave it all to the customer and cross your fingers. Make selling a high priority through better training, incentives and measurement – because you can’t improve what you can’t measure.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat