Skip to main content

10 Reasons Why Immigration is Good for Britain

  1. Every country needs people who WANT to work. Immigrants want to make a better life for themselves and for their children. The emphasis is on the word 'make'. This is in contrast to a massive UK benefit culture that's become the lifestyle of choice for so many claiming to deserve it solely because they were born here. Rights without responsibilities weaken societies.
  2. To leave your family, friends, language (usually), customs, familiar places and climate (usually better than cold damp UK) to forge a new life in an unknown place takes courage and determination - both qualities we should welcome into our society.
  3. The UK has always been a melting pot of nationalities. Until very recently we were by far the largest trading nation on the planet. Our nation is designed to mix peoples and cultures economically and culturally.
  4. By opening our doors to foreign cultures, our lives are enriched. Food, music, dance, art, theatre, sport and many other aspects of the way we entertain ourselves are more varied in the UK thanks to immigration, than anywhere else on Earth. We should celebrate this, not object to it.
  5. Cultural variety attracts tourists. There are 1,388 Italian restaurants in London alone. Rome,the capital of a country who worships food, has 11 Thai restaurants (London 360), and 6 Vietnamese (London 99). Britain is the place for the world's best eating experience.
  6. Foreign parents send their children here to study as temporary immigrants. The UK is the second most popular place (after the USA) for wealthy people to send their children for an education. Each one pays for many of own children to be educated by the state as well as creating a valuable group of educated anglophiles which will benefit trade and cultural relations with the UK when they return home.
  7. Because our education system is the envy of the world, we attract many of the world's leading experts in science and technology to enhance the potential of our research and development.
  8. Many businesses would not exist if immigrants didn't queue up for the dirty, sweaty, even dangerous work they offer, and which our own jobless shun. Should we prevent these businesses from operating here, or should we work with them to improve the lot of their employees and welcome the taxes they generate?
  9. Many non-UK cultures look after their older generations better than we do. We could learn a great deal from their senses of generational responsibility by them becoming our neighbours and shaming us into recognising how families really ought to function.
  10. Racists oppose immigration. By exposing repugnant behaviour based on ignorance to hard working, intelligent, caring neighbours who exhibit the widest possible variety of facial features and shades of skin, today's racists will eventually get used to the fact that we're all one species and who all equally deserve our respect and support.
And if you need more persuasion, read this in today's Telegraph. Here is an extract:

"The OECD has found that international migration is making a positive difference to Britain’s public finances. According to its number crunchers, the Government’s deficit is smaller that it would have been without the presence of immigrants in the UK.

The Treasury’s Office for Budget Responsibility regularly predicts that if immigration falls dramatically the public finances face a new £65 billion black hole because of lost tax revenues.

The Treasury itself puts 0.25 percentage points of annual GDP growth down to immigration. - that’s a bit more than £4 billion.

And a study last year by economists at University College London calculated that recent European immigrants pay £8.8 billion more in tax than they consume in public services.

Simply put: The recovery would not be going as well as it is without immigrants."


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat