Skip to main content

What's behind the trend to remove vwls?

What's with the current trnd to msspll wrds by tkng vwls away to create business and product names like Flikr and Tumblr? There's a crowd funding website I'm being encouraged to use, annoyingly called Crowdbnk.

I can understand making up words. Google is a good example. Story goes that Larry and Sergei thought they'd registered a word that means a large number (10 to the power of 100). But that's a Googol. So why this trend for removing vowels?

Creating names makes them memorable, easier to find internet domains for and to register as company names and trademarks. I long ago discovered using numerals to create business names like marketing4motorsport, 2nd Byte, 10ACT (pronounced tenacity!), R9 (when spelled out as rnine looks like the word mine - and therefore cost me less to buy the URL), and my latest business calls2account. But deliberately misspelling a word by leaving out vowels annoys me. It looks like a mistake. I love atention to detail. ;-)

Removing letters to create shorthand is not a modern trend. Ancient Hebrew, for example, leaves out vowels which are otherwise written as dots and dashes under consonants.


Above are several vowel possibilities applied to the B-sound


 This is the word Shalom (actually it's spelled Sholome)


And here is the same word as it would have appeared in a document, especially the Torah

The Romans also used to truncate words rather than waste effort writing or carving the whole thing.

But the reason the ancient Hebrews and Romans left out vowels obviously wasn't to try to own words for internet addresses, or just to save time and wall or paper space. And I don't think it was a form of laziness. Maybe it was for a far deeper reason which might explain the current trend.

Humans need to feel part of tribes or communities. We need to belong - both for nutrition, propagation, safety and to enable us to collaborate and evolve practices and inventions with people who don't want to kill us. It's in our genes. Communities therefore need shared habits or beliefs in order to bind them together and to distinguish them from others. Creating cult words and symbols provides community cohesion. People who use them are less likely to be confused with people who don't use them. They're a sort of password or coded identity. Flags, songs, chants, languages, even tattoos can be used to unite people by distinguishing them. So just like a made up deity who's unlikely to be accidentally replicated (so the more ridiculous, the better), names for online communities can also be made up so they are totally unique, but more importantly so they develop a following who share a belonging and affinity. Their followers get it. They share the coded identity. And just as the ancient Hebrews and Romans discovered, these names still remain pronounceable even though vwls have been rmvd. You simply wouldn't have understood it if I'd written that their oe had been eoe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite

Brilliant Inspiring Statues