Skip to main content

Brexit is a very bad idea

There's not long to go before the British people will be asked whether they want to leave the European Community (EC) or not. I predict most will say leave. We're proud to be British and nobody likes interference from abroad. We are also a net financial contributor to the EC, so voters are being told we'll immediately be better off if we leave. But we won't be. In fact it will quickly cost us very dearly indeed.

There are plenty of arguments for and against leaving, but for me the biggest issue will be the probable loss of export trade. The argument for Brexit is that we're a big market so why will the rest of Europe want to put up export barriers to sell their stuff to the UK? Why will they want to cut off their nezs to spite their visages?

The answer unfortunately is that while 50% of our exports are to the EC, only 10% of theirs are to us. In other words, we need them more than they need us. But the biggest threat will be from revenge.

There are two types of European member states. Net receivers of subsidies (the smaller, poorer countries who don't buy much from us), and net payers of subsidies (basically Germany, France and the UK). So who will be most pissed off with us if we leave? The countries who will have to bear a bigger share of the cost of Europe... and they're our customers, who will continue to have a choice where they source their food, cars, technology and professional services. So even if their governments decide they're still chums with us, for reasons I can't guess, their citizens certainly won't thank us for ruining their dreams of a united Europe and not sharing the load (refugee absorption included).

And then there's this little island off the coast of mainland Europe, providing most of the world's corporations and institutions, especially banks, a 'gateway to Europe'... the world's largest market. If we're not in Europe, we're no longer its gateway and all that banking and services business will go to an eager Frankfurt or Amsterdam (where they also speak great English and already have plenty of daily flights to markets we don't have the airport capacity to fly to). What option would the Chinese, Indians and even the Americans have? They need services inside Europe with all the legal stuff already in place. What use with UK regulation be if it's not recognised by EU countries?

The trouble is the British people hate bankers. Good riddance if they suffer - never mind all the employment and tax they pay. Will my fellow countrymen be concerned about their best interests? Probably not.

So loudmouths like Farage who claim if we leave, they will keep buying our stuff, are fooling themselves. They won't. Would you?

And while I'm calling Farage's dangerous bluff, an elderly friend of mine used to work with Nige's father who apparently pronounced his surname Farage as in marriage, not as in large. So at some point between childhood and politician, the leader of UKIP decided to sound more French... no doubt to encourage our neighbours to stay friends with us after we leave. Gros chance!

This is a divorce not a courteous declination of a marriage proposal. It will be bloody.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat