Skip to main content

"Kill their Families" says Trump. That'll work... Not!

In a recent interview, loudmouth Trump made headlines again by calling for the USA to "kill their families" in reference to Islamic terrorists. Whilst we're all naturally incensed by senseless horrors on our streets, this is clearly evil thinking. Such vile threats would have been worthy of the likes of Pol Pot and Hitler, not a candidate to become the 'leader of the land of the free'. But it's not just evil, it also demonstrates appallingly bad judgement if he believes that killing jihadist loved ones will stop them committing acts of revenge or prevent more enraged people from joining their ranks.

But whether we agree with Trump or not, the dreadful reality is that killing their families is precisely what we are doing by bombing their towns and homes. And the problem is that it makes terror attacks more likely, not less. By destroying whatever stability used to exist in the middle east, we've created dozens of desperate crazed jihadist groups all eager to prove their brand of madness is closer to what their god wants them to do than their competitor's equally barking mad idea.

I firmly believe history teaches us time and time again that interfering with religious fervour by force only inflames the problem, it never resolves it. Fanatics become more fanatical, not less when you use force to try to persuade them they're wrong. We're proving the point. We're angry about them killing us, so what do we do to stop them.... We kill a few of them (there are estimated to be around 70,000 fighters representing 15 identifiable Islamic factions in the Middle East, let alone numerous other extremist Islamic groups in Africa and Asia), and in so doing, we escalate whatever tensions already exist.

Politicians and military alike claim we're the good guys because we're using precision bombing. That's total rubbish! Read this report about Russians accidentally killing civilians. A tiny proportion of the ordinance being dropped by 'allied' bombers are expensive guided bombs. They're all dropping strings of high explosive in the hope one of them will hit a building identified by heaven knows who as a legitimate target. And if we're not killing individual fighters (tell me how a pilot flying at thousands of feet away and at hundreds of miles an hour can tell who or what they're blowing up), we're blowing up whatever slender chance the locals might have of rebuilding their future should anyone be left to clear up the rubble.

Our bombs are apparently not only intended to kill baddies, but 'slow them down' by destroying 'their infrastructure' like roads, airports, rail, power stations, oil wells and factories. The dreadful tragedy is that this 'infrastructure' we're destroying is what the people who live there will need to restore when they try to rebuild what little future their state might offer once fighting has stopped. Who's going to recreate their transport systems that took decades to reach even a pitiful state. Who's going to rebuild their water and sewage services, their train networks, their telecoms, their farms - all the sorts of things a country needs for even a rudimentary economy, let alone a self-sufficient nation protecting a content population?

We are doing precisely what the odious Trump and other angry knee-jerkers want us to do. Is this likely to make the Jihadists say "We were wrong. We should stop our terror attacks in case they bomb and attack us more", or are they more likely to say "They must leave our Caliphate. We need to attack them more to scare them off and prove their bombing doesn't work. Allah is on our side. We can't lose. The more we try to win this Jihad, the more Allah loves us and will reward us."

But the biggest ally ISIS and their chums have is Donno Trump. He wants to ban all muslims from entering the USA. That's racism pure and simple. He's PROVING to the mad mullahs that this is a holy war against the great satan. They've been claiming this all along and now Trump is agreeing. I'm very afraid that he may be about to have become responsible for a major escalation of attacks in Europe and the USA. And when they happen, he'll claim he was right all along and that this proves they all need to be kept out, or worse, maybe kicked out of America.

How do you get rid of a hornet's nest? According to Trump you kick it.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat

The Secrets of Hacker Golf

Social media is awash with professional golfers selling video training courses to help you perfect your swing, gain 50 yards on your drive and cut your handicap. They might help a few desperate souls, but the rest of us hackers already know everything we need to complete a round of golf without worrying the handicap committee or appearing on a competition winner's list. What those pros don't realise is that for us hacking golfers who very occasionally hit shots that if you hadn't seen how they were hit, end up where the pros might have put them, we already know everything we need to know - and more. Unlike pros who know how to time the perfect swing in order to caress a ball 350 yards down the centre of a fairway, we hackers need to assemble a far wider set of skills and know-how to complete 18 holes, about which pros have no comprehension, need, or desire to learn. Here are some of them: Never select your shot until after you've hit it. A variation on this is to alway