Skip to main content

Brexit. It might actually work out.

I promised myself I wouldn't bleat any more about Brexit. But my country has gone stark staring mad, we're tripping over the corpses of political leaders, and I received this excellent summary of the current state of play:

So, let me get this straight... the leader of the opposition campaigned to stay but secretly wanted to leave, so his party held a non-binding vote to shame him into resigning so someone else could lead the campaign to ignore the result of the non-binding referendum which many people now think was just angry people trying to shame politicians into seeing they'd all done nothing to help them.

Meanwhile, the man who campaigned to leave because he hoped losing would help him win the leadership of his party, accidentally won and ruined any chance of leading because the man who thought he couldn't lose, did - but resigned before actually doing the thing the vote had been about. The man who'd always thought he'd lead next, campaigned so badly that everyone thought he was lying when he said the economy would crash - and he was, but it did, but he's not resigned, but, like the man who lost and the man who won, also now can't become leader. Which means the woman who quietly campaigned to stay but always said she wanted to leave is likely to become leader instead.

Which means she holds the same view as the leader of the opposition but for opposite reasons, but her party's view of this view is the opposite of the opposition's. And the opposition aren't yet opposing anything because the leader isn't listening to his party, who aren't listening to the country, who aren't listening to experts or possibly paying that much attention at all. However, none of their opponents actually want to be the one to do the thing that the vote was about, so there's not yet anything actually on the table to oppose anyway. And if no one ever does do the thing that most people asked them to do, it will be undemocratic and if anyone ever does do it, it will be unlawful.

Is all of this perfectly clear ?

And now the person who started the whole thing has resigned because he’s deeply unpopular after the majority of the country finally agreed with him. But he had to leave his party because none of them have a clue what to do other than say pathetically naive things like ‘we’ll sell more to the rest of the world’. As if we haven't been trying to do that anyway. And how on earth would the UK be more attractive outside the EU than it is as the Gateway to Europe?

Which is why all this mess was totally predictable and only ever going to get worse as no-one has a clue how to proceed from here. In the meantime every business and foreign state outside the UK is booking flights to all our competitors to find more sensible long term deals in beckoning countries that do know where the fuck they're going. 

There has to be certainty. Brexit will never achieve certainty. It's far too complicated to unravel and reconstruct in a way that suits us and them (the whole world) equally. I voted Remain because I wasn't prepared to cross my fingers that (all) the experts who do understand the issues, might be wrong. It would seem I'm far less intelligent than 52% of our electorate who clearly do understand the complexity and were prepared to take or ignore the risks. (There should never have been a referendum asking such a complex question).

I don’t care how positive we’re all meant to try to be now, we’re in a fool’s paradise with no way out except crawling back to the EU.... which might actually happen if we never serve notice under Article 50. 

A large law firm, Mishcon de Reya, is taking legal action to prevent the Prime Minister from serving notice under Article 50 without an Act of Parliament to sanction it. If they are successful (and M de R are rarely not), then all MPs, including the Scots and N Irish (where voting was heavily in favour of Remaining), will have to vote on whether to sanction the next PM to serve that notice. Doing so without an Act of Parliament might lead to impeachment for treason. Since only around 150 out of the 650 MPs professed to voting Leave, and ALL the parties, except 1 MP representing UKIP, declared they support Remain, it's highly unlikely MPs with any conscience will change their mind. Each would argue that their constituents had charged them with safeguarding their best interests - and since a vote to Leave has already resulted in a collapse of our currency, political chaos and absolutely no plan emerging on how to leave (closed borders + free trade? Nope), they might reasonably claim that they've looked over the cliff, and there's no parachute or cushion. BUT rather than vote against the wishes (not instructions - a referendum is not legally binding) of their electorate, they have no option but to resign and force a general election. We might also see that constituencies that voted Leave were heavily for Leave whereas Remainers were much more evenly spread around the country. And there is some evidence that the people who don't normally vote in general elections, but who voted in the referendum (an additional 2.8m), voted for Leave. Perhaps they will return to staying at home next time. They'll also realise they can't win against the establishment. And don't forget the 2m ex-pats who weren't allowed to vote in the referendum (why not?!).

Now this is where it gets really interesting. There is only one party who supports Brexit. UKIP. But it only has one MP and now it's founder and leader, the puffed up, pompous, soundbiter Nigel Farage, has also resigned (to the cheer of his only MP). So there will be no credible Leave option offered to the voters. Every party will be saying 'don't be stupid - looked what just happened. It's only going to get much worse, and the poorest will suffer most'. Or hopefully they will also start saying 'look at what we're leaving. Isn't it great'. Being positive might work better next time Mr Osborne, don't you think?

The British public don't bother much with general elections. They either loathe all politicians (because it's fashionable to so, but can't be arsed to do it themselves), can't be bothered (what's on tele?), or are party faithfuls. With no Brexit plan, their holidays now costing 30% more, and only independent weirdos standing on a Leave ticket, I'm betting that a snap general election will restore balance and sense to the country, and to the world... until, that is, The Donald is handed the button.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!).

My gromble is abou…

Introducing Product Relationship Management - it's what customers want.

Most businesses these days have Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems which store and process vasts amounts of information about us. They use this information to generate communications, amongst other things, which target us to buy their products and services. CRM is all about how a business relates to its customers: Past (keeping them loyal through aftersales and service), Present (helping them buy through bricks and clicks channels) and Future (prospecting).

Most businesses will at some stage have declared themselves 'customer-centric'. They will probably have drawn diagrams on whiteboards that look something like these:



But there's a problem with this whole approach of keeping the customer at the centre of your world and the focal point for everything you do.Is it what the customer wants? Of course companies who ignore their customers eventually go out of business. And those who treat their customers well, tend to thrive. But is it really in the best interests …

The Titus Trust Deceives British Parents to Brainwash their Kids

I have a son who went to a well known preparatory school (7-13) in Surrey. He came home one day clutching a leaflet for fun activity holidays that the school promoted every summer. The Titus Trust operate several camps around the UK where they organise fun outdoor activities for youngsters. Something caught my eye in the leaflet hidden in a paragraph in one of the sections describing the holidays. They used the word Christian. It was the only place in the whole leaflet that the word was used. My suspicions raised, I hunted around the leaflet for more clues and found the imprint which said something like 'A Titus Trust Charity' (the name of the camps was on the title of the leaflet). I dug deeper and found some disturbing evidence of who was behind these 'fun' camps. This is what I wrote at the time to the headmaster:
Dear Headmaster

XXXX came home the other day extremely excited about an outward bound camp next summer that he and his friends had been told about by a rep…