Skip to main content

3 Factors for Start-up Success

Having created a handful of successful start-ups over the years, and mentored dozens more, I've evolved a simple 3-point checklist to help new businesses beat the odds (the majority of businesses fail within their first year). There are three considerations - Need, Awareness and Trust:-


Does your target market really need what you're thinking about selling to them? It's not about like or even want. Neither of these emotions are strong enough to relieve them of money.

I developed a graphic a while ago to demonstrate this gradient of sales potential:

The key is to really understand your market. Just hoping or guessing that people NEED your product or service is not enough. You must know. And you can only begin to do that by researching your market. And that means meeting them, as many as possible, and with as much cynicism as you can muster that what you're showing them is probably NOT what they need. Let them tell you, not the other way around.

Of course it is possible to sell someone something they like or want, but there's a purchasing hurdle you need to overcome first. They're not reaching for their wallet until you (or more likely your agent/salesman/relentless advertising etc) pushes them over the edge. It's a hard thing selling. Far easier to push against an open door. Find the need.


This is in two parts:
  1. Do they realise they need it?
  2. Do they know you exist?
The answer to both of these questions will define your marketing strategy. By way of example, I am currently exploring the market potential for a new type of notebook I invented called TABi (where every page has its own index tab on which you can write a date and short title to help you find it again). Most people still use paper notebooks, especially for lectures and meetings. They're great for making notes, but not so good at helping you find them again. TABi solves this. It's a search engine for paper. We've all been frustrated trying to find a note we've made. This solves the problem. It's cheaper and simpler than using a tablet or laptop (which also solve the problem) and it lets you continue to write on paper - which we love doing. So you'd think there would be a queue of people wanting to buy one...

All well and good until you apply the need awareness tests. Very few people, if any, actually realise it's a problem searching for notes in a notebook because until now there hasn't been an easier way to do it. So we assume we're already doing it as efficiently as possible. Everyone searches for notes the same way - flicking backwards and forwards until something catches our eye to suggest we're near or on the page we're looking for. So it's actually not a recognised problem. Notebook users only become aware that this is a problem when they are made aware that a better way exists.

So how do we alert them that there's a solution to a problem they didn't know they had? It's not a better notebook because a better notebook in the imagination of everyone who buys notebooks is one that does all the things they expect a notebook to do, only better. They simply don't expect their notebook to help them retrieve notes. So they wouldn't look for one that does.

This leads to a secondary problem. When people see a TABi for the first time, they don't know what problem it's solving, so they can't immediately understand how it works. After a quick demonstration, it becomes obvious to them, but at less than £20 per item we can't afford to send a salesman around to every retailer to demonstrate it. So just displaying the product amongst traditional notebooks is unlikely to drive sales - even if we attach eye-catching ads to the packaging. Why bother reading it if all you're searching for is a traditional notebook?

The solution (we think) is to send sample TABis to influential people in business so they will hopefully become aware that the problem of notebook information retrieval exists. Then, and only then, can they judge whether their organisation needs to improve its efficiency by buying large numbers of TABis (if you'd like to evaluate one on behalf of a large organisation, please email for a free copy).

There are plenty of other ways we might drive problem+solution awareness, but most of them will cost too much.


Why should people pay you to resolve their need? How do they know you really can resolve it better than anyone else? What is your authority? Why should they believe it?

Credibility is vital before people will give you their money. We're a suspicious species - and justifiably so. Not only are there an increasing number of scams, we're buying more and more online where you can't use many senses to determine whether the seller is trustworthy or not. This is particularly an issue in the sharing or collaborative economy where we are being asked to trust members of the public with little track record of trust. All we have are a few reviews and testimonials at best. The rest we judge with our eyes and, ideally, a referral from someone we already trust.

So trust evaluation is something we are increasingly relying on third party judgement to provide. Which in turn asks questions as to who amongst our friends, colleagues or friends of friends etc can we trust - and why?

This is an evolving landscape that the folks at Google and Facebook are very well aware. The key for start-ups to consider is to put themselves in the shoes of potential customers who have somehow been made aware of their existence to solve a real need. Is what they're seeing/reading/hearing/watching likely to instil confidence or will they believe they'll be taking a risk? Pictures of happy customers, lists of qualifications, testimonials, popular blogs posts, likes and shares on FB, retweets and favourites, a professional appearance in person and online - all contribute to evidence for 'trust'.

Wishful thinking doesn't fool anybody.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite