Skip to main content

3 Factors for Start-up Success

Having created a handful of successful start-ups over the years, and mentored dozens more, I've evolved a simple 3-point checklist to help new businesses beat the odds (the majority of businesses fail within their first year). There are three considerations - Need, Awareness and Trust:-


Does your target market really need what you're thinking about selling to them? It's not about like or even want. Neither of these emotions are strong enough to relieve them of money.

I developed a graphic a while ago to demonstrate this gradient of sales potential:

The key is to really understand your market. Just hoping or guessing that people NEED your product or service is not enough. You must know. And you can only begin to do that by researching your market. And that means meeting them, as many as possible, and with as much cynicism as you can muster that what you're showing them is probably NOT what they need. Let them tell you, not the other way around.

Of course it is possible to sell someone something they like or want, but there's a purchasing hurdle you need to overcome first. They're not reaching for their wallet until you (or more likely your agent/salesman/relentless advertising etc) pushes them over the edge. It's a hard thing selling. Far easier to push against an open door. Find the need.


This is in two parts:
  1. Do they realise they need it?
  2. Do they know you exist?
The answer to both of these questions will define your marketing strategy. By way of example, I am currently exploring the market potential for a new type of notebook I invented called TABi (where every page has its own index tab on which you can write a date and short title to help you find it again). Most people still use paper notebooks, especially for lectures and meetings. They're great for making notes, but not so good at helping you find them again. TABi solves this. It's a search engine for paper. We've all been frustrated trying to find a note we've made. This solves the problem. It's cheaper and simpler than using a tablet or laptop (which also solve the problem) and it lets you continue to write on paper - which we love doing. So you'd think there would be a queue of people wanting to buy one...

All well and good until you apply the need awareness tests. Very few people, if any, actually realise it's a problem searching for notes in a notebook because until now there hasn't been an easier way to do it. So we assume we're already doing it as efficiently as possible. Everyone searches for notes the same way - flicking backwards and forwards until something catches our eye to suggest we're near or on the page we're looking for. So it's actually not a recognised problem. Notebook users only become aware that this is a problem when they are made aware that a better way exists.

So how do we alert them that there's a solution to a problem they didn't know they had? It's not a better notebook because a better notebook in the imagination of everyone who buys notebooks is one that does all the things they expect a notebook to do, only better. They simply don't expect their notebook to help them retrieve notes. So they wouldn't look for one that does.

This leads to a secondary problem. When people see a TABi for the first time, they don't know what problem it's solving, so they can't immediately understand how it works. After a quick demonstration, it becomes obvious to them, but at less than £20 per item we can't afford to send a salesman around to every retailer to demonstrate it. So just displaying the product amongst traditional notebooks is unlikely to drive sales - even if we attach eye-catching ads to the packaging. Why bother reading it if all you're searching for is a traditional notebook?

The solution (we think) is to send sample TABis to influential people in business so they will hopefully become aware that the problem of notebook information retrieval exists. Then, and only then, can they judge whether their organisation needs to improve its efficiency by buying large numbers of TABis (if you'd like to evaluate one on behalf of a large organisation, please email for a free copy).

There are plenty of other ways we might drive problem+solution awareness, but most of them will cost too much.


Why should people pay you to resolve their need? How do they know you really can resolve it better than anyone else? What is your authority? Why should they believe it?

Credibility is vital before people will give you their money. We're a suspicious species - and justifiably so. Not only are there an increasing number of scams, we're buying more and more online where you can't use many senses to determine whether the seller is trustworthy or not. This is particularly an issue in the sharing or collaborative economy where we are being asked to trust members of the public with little track record of trust. All we have are a few reviews and testimonials at best. The rest we judge with our eyes and, ideally, a referral from someone we already trust.

So trust evaluation is something we are increasingly relying on third party judgement to provide. Which in turn asks questions as to who amongst our friends, colleagues or friends of friends etc can we trust - and why?

This is an evolving landscape that the folks at Google and Facebook are very well aware. The key for start-ups to consider is to put themselves in the shoes of potential customers who have somehow been made aware of their existence to solve a real need. Is what they're seeing/reading/hearing/watching likely to instil confidence or will they believe they'll be taking a risk? Pictures of happy customers, lists of qualifications, testimonials, popular blogs posts, likes and shares on FB, retweets and favourites, a professional appearance in person and online - all contribute to evidence for 'trust'.

Wishful thinking doesn't fool anybody.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Introducing Product Relationship Management - it's what customers want.

Most businesses these days have Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems which store and process vasts amounts of information about us. They use this information to generate communications, amongst other things, which target us to buy their products and services. CRM is all about how a business relates to its customers: Past (keeping them loyal through aftersales and service), Present (helping them buy through bricks and clicks channels) and Future (prospecting). Most businesses will at some stage have declared themselves 'customer-centric'. They will probably have drawn diagrams on whiteboards that look something like these: But there's a problem with this whole approach of keeping the customer at the centre of your world and the focal point for everything you do. Is it what the customer wants ? Of course companies who ignore their customers eventually go out of business. And those who treat their customers well, tend to thrive. But is it really in the best inte

The Secrets of Hacker Golf

Social media is awash with professional golfers selling video training courses to help you perfect your swing, gain 50 yards on your drive and cut your handicap. They might help a few desperate souls, but the rest of us hackers already know everything we need to complete a round of golf without worrying the handicap committee or appearing on a competition winner's list. What those pros don't realise is that for us hacking golfers who very occasionally hit shots that if you hadn't seen how they were hit, end up where the pros might have put them, we already know everything we need to know - and more. Unlike pros who know how to time the perfect swing in order to caress a ball 350 yards down the centre of a fairway, we hackers need to assemble a far wider set of skills and know-how to complete 18 holes, about which pros have no comprehension, need, or desire to learn. Here are some of them: Never select your shot until after you've hit it. A variation on this is to alway