Skip to main content

EU Immigrants - UK Gov Missing the Point

Lots of talk today about EU immigration from Amber Rudd the UK Home Secretary. The Brexiter demand to 'take control of our borders' but allow in who we want, sounds, on the face of it, to be sensible. But whatever 'process' the government invents to control migration from the EU, it won't work for my business or for countless others who've benefited from having access to a huge pool of talent eager to dedicate their futures to the UK economy.

There have been many reasons why people came to the UK to work (if they didn't want to work, they were unlikely to have made the effort to leave their homes). Most, if not all refugees don't possess EU passports, so they already have to apply for visas. I've written other posts about our moral duty to lead the world in showing compassion to these people who would, and have historically enriched the UK anyway.

There are two types of EU immigrant workers:
  1. EU citizens who live abroad: Specialised recruitment agencies embedded in countries like Poland and Romania usually find these workers for employers like fruit farmers who generally need seasonal workers. Employers are used to providing accommodation and other services to people who have no permanent home here. There's probably no reason why such workers can't continue to come to the UK post-Brexit... assuming they still want to come to a country whose citizens have voted to keep them out. Visas would be needed and no doubt bureaucracy will create difficulties for both the workers and the employers, but where there's a will...
  2. EU citizens who have already decided to live here: These are typically highly skilled, young people who have decided for whatever reason to seek employment in the UK. They move here first, often squatting with friends, and then look for work. These, to our cost, are the people we will lose.
My tech business has recruited a wide range of EU nationals who not only bring skills they acquired at the expense of their homelands, but also languages and other sets of experiences that we find increasingly hard to find amongst home-grown job applicants. And because none of them arrive with a local mummy-and-daddy-parachute if things don't work out, they make it work out. Their enthusiasm and dedication is fantastic. We love them!

Problem is, they're no longer coming here to seek their future. Last year the UK told them loud and clear that they're not welcome and might even be thrown out in 2019. It's unlikely that will happen, although not impossible, but who in their right minds would still choose to come here rather than any of the other 27 nations keen to exploit their talents. We've already lost a few great people not willing to risk trying to live here long-term. If they get an offer of a better job from within the EU, they'd be crazy not to take it if their next move might not be possible in the UK.

So it's all very well saying 'we will have our pick of who we want to let in', but if they're not already here, how do we recruit them? And even if we could find ways of contacting them in Warsaw, Paris and Madrid, how do we interview them properly? Then assuming we make an offer and it's accepted, we do not want the responsibility of helping them find homes... and that's if we can instantly get them a visa. It's simply not how it works now, and it won't work differently come the 2019 cliff-edge. You can't take the risk to find work here, so you take your skills elsewhere.

It's not going to hit us in 2019 (even if we have worked out how to do it by then - fat chance!), it's hitting us NOW.

But there is one silver lining. The banks are already leaving, so they won't be needing EU jobseekers, which will take a bit of pressure off the top end of the London housing and help to reduce property prices. Too bad if you already own one of course (or if you think using taxes on banks was a good idea).


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat

The Secrets of Hacker Golf

Social media is awash with professional golfers selling video training courses to help you perfect your swing, gain 50 yards on your drive and cut your handicap. They might help a few desperate souls, but the rest of us hackers already know everything we need to complete a round of golf without worrying the handicap committee or appearing on a competition winner's list. What those pros don't realise is that for us hacking golfers who very occasionally hit shots that if you hadn't seen how they were hit, end up where the pros might have put them, we already know everything we need to know - and more. Unlike pros who know how to time the perfect swing in order to caress a ball 350 yards down the centre of a fairway, we hackers need to assemble a far wider set of skills and know-how to complete 18 holes, about which pros have no comprehension, need, or desire to learn. Here are some of them: Never select your shot until after you've hit it. A variation on this is to alway