Skip to main content

Free Trade Agreement - not such a big deal perhaps

I am wholeheartedly a Remainer. However, 'my side' can from time to time over-egg the dangers of leaving when it comes to Free Trade Agreements (FTA).

The first thing to point out is that trade agreements work both ways. When Brexiters state 'they will still want to sell us their cars' - a reference to VW, BMW, Renault, Fiat and Mercedes putting pressure on the EU to keep trade flowing - the only reason they might face tariffs will not be because of the EU mandating 'punishing' taxes, but the UK's own customs imposing them. It's the importing country who 'fines' other nations' exporters. In other words, if VWs etc attract tariffs, it's because the UK government applies them to force Brits to buy British cars.

So when they try to make VWs and BMWs more expensive for British citizens to buy, that's not going to make them popular at home. It's not going to happen. Brits will continue to buy their French, Italian and German cars without being fined by their own government. That's called shooting ourselves in the foot. If BMWs etc weren't already being sold here, then perhaps tariffs might be considered. But we've been buying and desiring them for donkey's years.

Whether the EU make British cars more expensive or not, is for them to decide. Frankly they probably will - and who in the EU will give a damn? They've got plenty of choice over which cars to buy other than British ones. We don't.

But the claim by 'my side' I need to challenge most is that when we leave in March 2019, we will immediately fall outside the existing FTAs the EU has already negotiated, and that this will hurt. The numbers of countries claimed that we will no longer have FTAs with has variously drifted from 50 up to 75 and somewhere I even read over 90. The fact is about 85... but what we're not told is who these FTAs are with. And the truth is, they're not worth bothering about. Nearly all want to sell us stuff. We sell them all very little indeed.

Here's the list of all nations the EU has FTAs with (35), have agreed but not signed (50), or are still negotiating (12). These exclude nations like the USA and China with which the EU has no trade agreements. Sounds a lot, but the vast majority are small third world countries who don't buy anything from the UK anyway. All the big trading nations are either in the EU or don't have FTAs with the EU.

So despite wanting to wave the 'we'll lose all our FTAs' flag, the reality is the only FTA that matters is the one with the EU, and they're not going to give us one. And the UK won't impose unpopular tariffs on EU imports as a tit for tat, so we've got nothing to negotiate. Which is why I'm a Remainer.

Oh and if you're screaming at the screen 'what about our sovereignty?', I challenge you to name one law we don't want that's been imposed on us. That's one sodding law in 43 years of membership. Can't? Perhaps that's because we helped determine them and could veto those we didn't like, and because their purpose is to raise standards everywhere in the interests of safety, fairness and equality. But we Brits know best.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Introducing Product Relationship Management - it's what customers want.

Most businesses these days have Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems which store and process vasts amounts of information about us. They use this information to generate communications, amongst other things, which target us to buy their products and services. CRM is all about how a business relates to its customers: Past (keeping them loyal through aftersales and service), Present (helping them buy through bricks and clicks channels) and Future (prospecting). Most businesses will at some stage have declared themselves 'customer-centric'. They will probably have drawn diagrams on whiteboards that look something like these: But there's a problem with this whole approach of keeping the customer at the centre of your world and the focal point for everything you do. Is it what the customer wants ? Of course companies who ignore their customers eventually go out of business. And those who treat their customers well, tend to thrive. But is it really in the best inte

The Secrets of Hacker Golf

Social media is awash with professional golfers selling video training courses to help you perfect your swing, gain 50 yards on your drive and cut your handicap. They might help a few desperate souls, but the rest of us hackers already know everything we need to complete a round of golf without worrying the handicap committee or appearing on a competition winner's list. What those pros don't realise is that for us hacking golfers who very occasionally hit shots that if you hadn't seen how they were hit, end up where the pros might have put them, we already know everything we need to know - and more. Unlike pros who know how to time the perfect swing in order to caress a ball 350 yards down the centre of a fairway, we hackers need to assemble a far wider set of skills and know-how to complete 18 holes, about which pros have no comprehension, need, or desire to learn. Here are some of them: Never select your shot until after you've hit it. A variation on this is to alway