Skip to main content

The New Priority - Getting Organised

Have you realised how excessive almost everything has become? Today we are literally overwhelmed by choices and by stuff.
  • What to watch
  • Which app to use
  • Phone to buy
  • Tweets to follow and read
  • News
  • Transport
  • Clothes
  • Food
  • Education
  • Holidays, flights, hotels
  • Careers
  • Sports
  • Friends
  • Choice choice choice
Reading, buying, watching, doing, meeting, exploring, finding etc etc. So much more to do, to own, to use, or to waste our money on than any generation has ever experienced - and it's relentlessly getting worse (or better if you relish excess). The global marketplace has only just begun to assail us with all its offerings, and it's limitless. So how do we control this overload of decision making?

And it's not just individuals who need to become better organised to manage this deluge. Organisations are called this for a reason too.

We assign values to each and every element trying to impinge on our lives. Will it resolve a problem? Will it look good on me? Can I afford it? Will I like the taste? What will people think of me if I use it?... We decide whether something needs to enter our world, or remain on the outside. We do this by applying rules to decide which can enter and which can't - and which we're still considering.

Most of these 'rules' are applied subconsciously according to the values we hold. We just know if we 'like' something or we don't. Whether it satisfies our values or not. If we're not sure, we might try it or ignore it. We apply those values instantly and automatically to everything entering our perspective, and we reassess our values constantly to ensure there's a minimum amount of conflict between what we have and do, and the values we believe we hold about them.

Which means we increasingly need help! When we can't evaluate something, we usually seek value judgements provided by others. Reviews. Likes. Even Google Rankings is an assessment of the world's preference about what we're searching for. There's vast overload of choice and therefore value requirement, and it's only going to get worse.

Movements to help us organise our lives are becoming increasingly popular such as the young sensation Marie Kondo and her "Organise the world" tidying methods. Or the vast number of companies offering data management and AI services to corporations. We all know the internet is awash with data about every one of us - and it's only just started collecting it. It won't be long before personal online organisers or 'agents' will be making decisions on our behalf based on values it learns that we have. The range of things we will be offered in future will be filtered and curated to surprise and hopefully delight us.

Netflix and Amazon already confront us with 'You might like' opportunities based on their experience of us. What if they got together, along with the other FAANGs and countless other places we visit and give up our identity, to work out what we really would like to have and to do? Will we be able to resist or are we bound to become putty in their hands? And will we care if we're 'happy'... and what does that mean?

The growing profusion of data we each create is why I invented TABi, a new type of note book (A4 and A5) where you write a tab for every page so you can quickly organise all your notes to help you find them again. Even your notes need better organising - otherwise, if you still love paper as I do, the only other option for organising them is chronological. Or random, as it's otherwise known.






Is more choice a good thing? Is handing control of it to a machine going to bother us, or will it be essential as choice becomes impossible to control.

Life is becoming increasingly complex. We'd better prepare for it - or just relax and let the machine take over... Then who's the machine?!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To kill or not to kill.

Had an interesting discussion with a Muslim friend today about the ethics of killing. Could it ever be morally justifiable? Abrahamic scriptures, especially the old testament, are awash with murders and killings, some sanctioned by the prophets and assorted mouthpieces for god. Some killing is even mandatory. For example all Jews are instructed in the old Testament to kill everyone belonging to the 7 Canaanite tribes for example - Deut 20:17 , or to slaughter Amaleks, especially their children - Deut 25:19 . So accepting for a moment that these draconian instructions were written in times when tribal leaders had fewer options available to them with respect to managing miscreants and maintaining some sort of law and order, I suspect that most people today would agree that killing people is a bad thing and should not be condoned except under extraordinary circumstances. My friend and I then proceeded to try to list those circumstances. We started with self-defence or perhaps protecti...

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo...

Don't Use My Taxes to Kill Syrians. Use Them to Educate Refugee Children

We (the UK and US) are about to start killing Syrians just like we killed Libyans, Iraqis and Afghans in the name of freedom and democracy... Only to end up with a bigger mess of warring tribes than we started with. We need to confront the reason they are killing each other, not perpetuate the hatred. Why do our press and politicians instantly jump to the conclusion that the only people who were likely to have used chemical weapons were the Syrian army? I believe it's because we still harbour the idea that if 'the people' rise up against their leaders, then we're witnessing democracy in action - and democracy equals freedom of choice... which we support. BUT when 'the people' are religious fundamentalists determined to enforce their brand of delusional beliefs and customs on their neighbourhood, should we really be supporting them? What's the difference between uprisings of these people in our own countries (London 7/7, 9/11, Boston Marathon etc), and u...