Skip to main content

The New Priority - Getting Organised

Have you realised how excessive almost everything has become? Today we are literally overwhelmed by choices and by stuff.
  • What to watch
  • Which app to use
  • Phone to buy
  • Tweets to follow and read
  • News
  • Transport
  • Clothes
  • Food
  • Education
  • Holidays, flights, hotels
  • Careers
  • Sports
  • Friends
  • Choice choice choice
Reading, buying, watching, doing, meeting, exploring, finding etc etc. So much more to do, to own, to use, or to waste our money on than any generation has ever experienced - and it's relentlessly getting worse (or better if you relish excess). The global marketplace has only just begun to assail us with all its offerings, and it's limitless. So how do we control this overload of decision making?

And it's not just individuals who need to become better organised to manage this deluge. Organisations are called this for a reason too.

We assign values to each and every element trying to impinge on our lives. Will it resolve a problem? Will it look good on me? Can I afford it? Will I like the taste? What will people think of me if I use it?... We decide whether something needs to enter our world, or remain on the outside. We do this by applying rules to decide which can enter and which can't - and which we're still considering.

Most of these 'rules' are applied subconsciously according to the values we hold. We just know if we 'like' something or we don't. Whether it satisfies our values or not. If we're not sure, we might try it or ignore it. We apply those values instantly and automatically to everything entering our perspective, and we reassess our values constantly to ensure there's a minimum amount of conflict between what we have and do, and the values we believe we hold about them.

Which means we increasingly need help! When we can't evaluate something, we usually seek value judgements provided by others. Reviews. Likes. Even Google Rankings is an assessment of the world's preference about what we're searching for. There's vast overload of choice and therefore value requirement, and it's only going to get worse.

Movements to help us organise our lives are becoming increasingly popular such as the young sensation Marie Kondo and her "Organise the world" tidying methods. Or the vast number of companies offering data management and AI services to corporations. We all know the internet is awash with data about every one of us - and it's only just started collecting it. It won't be long before personal online organisers or 'agents' will be making decisions on our behalf based on values it learns that we have. The range of things we will be offered in future will be filtered and curated to surprise and hopefully delight us.

Netflix and Amazon already confront us with 'You might like' opportunities based on their experience of us. What if they got together, along with the other FAANGs and countless other places we visit and give up our identity, to work out what we really would like to have and to do? Will we be able to resist or are we bound to become putty in their hands? And will we care if we're 'happy'... and what does that mean?

The growing profusion of data we each create is why I invented TABi, a new type of note book (A4 and A5) where you write a tab for every page so you can quickly organise all your notes to help you find them again. Even your notes need better organising - otherwise, if you still love paper as I do, the only other option for organising them is chronological. Or random, as it's otherwise known.

Is more choice a good thing? Is handing control of it to a machine going to bother us, or will it be essential as choice becomes impossible to control.

Life is becoming increasingly complex. We'd better prepare for it - or just relax and let the machine take over... Then who's the machine?!


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat