Skip to main content

Respect - Especially for Football Referees

When my kids were young, they would come home from school saying they hated Lucy, Kate or James. Like every parent I used to agonise over what advice to send my little darlings back to school with which a) wouldn't get them detention / prison sentence, and b) might help them turn adversity into advantage by avoiding retaliation and potential escalation. Eventually my advice boiled down to one simple idea for them to remember:

If you make some one feel good about themselves, they'll feel good about you.

So if Lucy calls you fat and ugly, instead of hitting her or insulting her back, why not try "I love your hair, or can you teach me the words to that song....". Not only will that take all the wind out of her sails, she probably won't jeopardise you not saying nice things again, so she may start being nice to you. Worth a try? If it doesn't work, you can always bop her.

Psychologists call this Cognitive Dissonance. In a nutshell there are three components to an 'attitude' - Cognitive (what you believe), Affective (how you feel), and Behavioural (your actions). The idea is that if one of those components is at odds with the other two, you need to make changes to reduce that Dissonance. So if you know smoking is bad for you (Cognitive), and you still smoke (Behaviour), you might argue that it only affects heavy smokers, or that you can stop at any time (Affective) - thereby reducing the tension between what you know and the way you behave. So Lucy will now have dissonance by knowing you make her feel good about the most important thing in the world - herself - and her behaviour towards you. So if she persists in her behaviour, she will negatively affect feeling good. So something has to change to reflect the revised way she now feels about you, hopefully by modifying her behaviour. People crave others to show them respect. And one of the most effective ways to receive respect is to give it first.

Politicians, the Rich, Celebrities etc, all feed off popularity. It's their drug. In order to feed their addiction, they fawn over their fans/voters/acolytes to vie with each other over who has more Twitter followers or more press mentions. It's their measure of how much respect they engender. To achieve self-respect (because they know they're really ordinary folk who sometimes have diarrhoea, pick their noses and fart), they need people to form opinions about them that compete with reality. They need to keep proving to themselves that they are special. To do that, they shower followers with 'respect' by, for example, feeding them personal but pointless banalities on Twitter - "I'm sitting in an airport lounge", or re-tweeting something one of their 'famous' (equally insecure) chums has tweeted. "If I respect someone famous, then their followers might respect me...". Viral fame?

Anyway, to the point of this blog about Respect and how it relates to football. Several years ago I saw a short report on TV about the abuse regularly suffered by amateur football referees. Not just by players, but also by spectators - often parents. The result being that games often ended in disarray and there were too few people wanting to become referees. Watch any professional game and you will see gaggles of over-paid primadonnas surrounding referees to yell foul-mouthed rants at them. Amateurs simply follow the example of their heroes.

This, by the way, is at complete odds with my favourite team sport, rugby, where referees are called 'sir' and their word is absolute law. Make one comment to a ref about his decision, and your team gets a penalty against them. You will probably also be sent off the pitch for 10 minutes (the Sin Bin) and you may even face post-match disciplinary proceedings. Don't forget that rugby is legalised barbarity committed by brutal killing machines fighting over a ball in front of baying hoards of partisan spectators. But as a direct result of respect-for-the-ref and therefore the rules and traditions of the game, there is never, and I mean never, any crowd violence at rugby games - anywhere in the world. Policing rugby matches, at any level, is pointless. Opposing fans are never separated by barriers and 'kettling' to and from grounds. If anyone gets out of order (and it's always because they've drunk too much), fellow fans from their own club will sort them out. A rugby match is always a good-natured civilised affair. Passionate, of course, but totally respectful of each other and of fair play. Cheating is rejected at every level (remember Bloodgate and the shame on Harlequins - my club sadly).

So I started thinking about how we might inject respect-for-the-ref into football at the amateur and perhaps school level. Hundreds of thousands of young men (and many girls no doubt) gather together at weekends to kick a ball around and shout obscenities at referees. They represent a significant chunk of our youth, and nearly all 'youth' support a pro team. So how can we inject respect into football, and in doing so, into the crowds at league games, and ultimately into society in general? How do we seed respect back into a country where patently riots on our streets demonstrate in some corners it has been lost?... I wonder if any of the 1,600 arrested were rugby players, or even rugby supporters?....

So I asked myself, 'who does have respect on the pitch?'. Who has the power to control the way the players behave? Answer: The captains. Every single player on the pitch will do everything possible to impress the captain in order to keep their place, curry favour with the whole team and impress supporters (inc wives and girlfriends). So how can we get captains to force their teams to show respect to the ref? Indeed captains are often the worst offenders, being the first to complain and swear at the ref (and thereby increase the respect their team and spectators have for them in the way they stand up to authority). Indeed being sent off by the ref for insubordination earns great respect in the pub afterwards.

My idea is very simple. Give amateur football referees the power to reward each captain in some way (see below) if by the end of the game they judge his/her team has shown appropriate respect.

About 10 years ago I wrote to the FA (copying in the Home Secretary - to ensure I got a response from the FA) when they were printing posters asking teams to show respect for refs (posters!? very compelling). I suggested that they instruct every premier league side in the country to put aside a hundred or so seats for the captains of local amateur football clubs. How the precise numbers worked would be down to the FA to work out with the clubs. So the reward needn't be for every captain to get the chance to go to every game, but perhaps 1 in 3 home games. Better still, the captains can earn points administered by a central web service which eventually qualifies them for a ticket to the FA cup final, premiership games, dinners with league players etc. The point being that if any player does anything during the game which might affect his captain's chance of being awarded points towards this highly prized reward, then that player will be in considerable trouble - and the captain will only know after the end of the game whether the ref will award the Respect Point or not.

Simple. Its a Respect Chain. Work out who already has the respect of the players, and challenge them to control them or they lose out. Needless to say the gutless FA wrote to me saying 'interesting idea but the poster campaign was their strategy'.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Would we pay more for their stuff?

I'm confused. Brexiters argue the Germans, Italians and French will still want to sell us their cars, so continued free trade with the UK is in their best interests. But we'll have to negotiate this (with an EU unwilling to make leaving easy) by threatening to make their cars more expensive for British people to buy. We'll do this because WE need to make imports more expensive to try to restore our balance of payments. Are Brits prepared to pay more for their Audis, Fiats and Renaults in order to make British cars more appealing, or do Brexiters want to pay more in order to punish them for taxing our insurance and banking products? Either way, imports will cost more. While in the EU, we buy their cars because we like the choice and don't want our own government to tax them. Indeed it would be better for British car manufacturing if we went back to the good old days of being encouraged to buy cheaper British cars (made by foreign owned factories). Is that what Brexite

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat