Skip to main content

National Debt not helped by Ignorant Voters

Have just been listening to the BBC trying to squeeze the last ounce of opinion out of a bored and disinterested public about the chancellor's Autumn Statement - or budget as we used to call it. One mother in Huddersfield said something which goes right to the heart of the difficulty we're in and the problem we face in the next general election. She said "There's nothing in it for me. It's their debt they're trying to reduce, not mine."

And there's the problem. In fact two problems. Firstly she expects all budgets to have 'something in it for her'. Benefits good, tax bad. The second issue is that the average voter does not understand that it's her government. Her state. Her debt. I was half expecting something like 'it's the bankers fault, let them pay it off'. Pointless trying to explain public finance to her. All she knows is how much money she personally has and how far it will stretch. Fair enough. Most people can't think collectively, and fewer still have the patience to try to learn about what they see as 'maffs'. They can only understand issues which affect them directly, and then only if it's easy to grasp (explains religion too... but I digress). Asking them to extend their judgement to government issues like finance, defence, legislation or anything which doesn't instantly make a difference to them, is useless. They simply don't understand the bigger picture or how it relates to their future and their kids'. The fact that its her credit card, her mortgage, her car loan, her free this, that and the other, paid for by the rest of us by borrowing from an increasingly uncertain future - and dominated by a hard-working China, not us - is way beyond her comprehension. But unfortunately it matters. It matters a lot.

Democracy puts these people in the driving seat. Government's have to steer impossible courses between doing what's right for the nation, and doing what's popular with people like our Huddersfield mother. Statistically and mercifully she probably won't use her vote. But you can see how easy it will be for left-wing politicians to play on the ignorance of voters who can't understand the principal of 'we're all in this together'.

So the bitter pills that Osbourne and co. need to feed us have to be sold more cleverly to an unsympathetic public who don't think the problem he's trying to solve relates to them. Either that, or start a revolution that eradicates the ridiculous notion that everyone's equally capable of electing the best leaders for our future. Like China, or Singapore, or Libya... don't get me started.

If it wasn't for the likes of the BBC trying to bend over backwards to 'hear the views of the nation', the intellectually challenged wouldn't be given a voice, leaving the rest of us to try to influence decision makers to 'do the right thing'. I suppose the only problem is that the 'right thing' (making sure her kids have a better chance of learning maths despite her disinterest - 'what did school ever do for me?') has to be tempered with the 'best thing' economically (where greed will prevail if left unchecked). It's just that there's too many voters who haven't a clue. Which is why for the first time in my life I've donated to a political party in order, I hope, to help our Huddersfield mum wise up... just a bit.


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Introducing Product Relationship Management - it's what customers want.

Most businesses these days have Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems which store and process vasts amounts of information about us. They use this information to generate communications, amongst other things, which target us to buy their products and services. CRM is all about how a business relates to its customers: Past (keeping them loyal through aftersales and service), Present (helping them buy through bricks and clicks channels) and Future (prospecting). Most businesses will at some stage have declared themselves 'customer-centric'. They will probably have drawn diagrams on whiteboards that look something like these: But there's a problem with this whole approach of keeping the customer at the centre of your world and the focal point for everything you do. Is it what the customer wants ? Of course companies who ignore their customers eventually go out of business. And those who treat their customers well, tend to thrive. But is it really in the best in

The Titus Trust Deceives British Parents to Brainwash their Kids

I have a son who went to a well known preparatory school (7-13) in Surrey. He came home one day clutching a leaflet for fun activity holidays that the school promoted every summer. The Titus Trust operate several camps around the UK where they organise fun outdoor activities for youngsters. Something caught my eye in the leaflet hidden in a paragraph in one of the sections describing the holidays. They used the word Christian. It was the only place in the whole leaflet that the word was used. My suspicions raised, I hunted around the leaflet for more clues and found the imprint which said something like 'A Titus Trust Charity' (the name of the camps was on the title of the leaflet). I dug deeper and found some disturbing evidence of who was behind these 'fun' camps. This is what I wrote at the time to the headmaster: Dear Headmaster XXXX came home the other day extremely excited about an outward bound camp next summer that he and his friends had been told about by a r