Skip to main content

She shot a man from half a mile away


I have just received this 'viral' email:
The Real Miss America
There's a Proud Papa out there somewhere.
[missamerica.jpg]


This 19 year old ex-cheerleader now an Air Force Security Forces Sniper, was watching a road in Pakistan that led to a NATO military base when she observed a man digging by the road. She engaged the target (she shot him).
It turned out he was a bomb maker for the Taliban, and he was burying an IED that was to be detonated when a U.S. patrol walked by 30 minutes later. It would have certainly killed and wounded several soldiers. The interesting fact of this story is the shot was measured at 725 yards. She shot him as he was bent over burying the bomb. The shot went through his rectum and into the bomb which detonated and he was blown to pieces. The Air Force made a motivational poster of her. (Folks, that's a shot 25 yards longer than seven football fields) and the last thing that came out of his mouth ..... was his ass!
If You Can Not Stand Behind Our Troops, please Feel Free To Stand In Front Of Them!

I'm sure the "folks" are real proud of her ass kicking skills. But whose ass? How did she know that chap was planting a bomb (odious cretin though he was) from half a mile away? Had she and her chums not been there, would he have been planting an IED? But most worryingly, how many road builders, utility workers, good citizens repairing potholes (or previous IED craters), or just chaps waiting by the side of the road will sharp-shooters and drones kill from half a mile away, or more, before they get another bomber with a 'lucky' shot? And how will we know about them?

But assuming most of her fans don't really care as long as somebody's ass is being kicked, how many more bombers will each of those 'oops kills' create?

The more the west whoops with joy and howls of laughter when blue-eyed babes and their like, fighting for god and country, make foreigners 'eat their asses', the more we anger our 'enemies', and the more enemies we create. We are fuelling their cause by perfectly demonstrating that right is better to fight and die for than might. Do we really want Miss Americas to be doing this, or should we be prouder of her had she been a nurse or a teacher working with the brothers and sisters of the man she shot?

We're beginning to treat our fighters, and especially their generals (did you read about Patraeus' huge wealth and pampered lifestyle?!), like celebrities and untouchables. Of course we need to support them and be grateful for the work they do. The weak need to be protected by the strong. That's why it's called Defence. But equally we have to be careful not to disrespect our adversaries. We're all one species and we need to learn how to live together, not celebrate brutality and callousness. Education, respect and compassion vs ignorance and amusement derived from the suffering of people we've been told are 'out to get us'.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Thanks for taking an interest.

Popular posts from this blog

To kill or not to kill.

Had an interesting discussion with a Muslim friend today about the ethics of killing. Could it ever be morally justifiable? Abrahamic scriptures, especially the old testament, are awash with murders and killings, some sanctioned by the prophets and assorted mouthpieces for god. Some killing is even mandatory. For example all Jews are instructed in the old Testament to kill everyone belonging to the 7 Canaanite tribes for example - Deut 20:17 , or to slaughter Amaleks, especially their children - Deut 25:19 . So accepting for a moment that these draconian instructions were written in times when tribal leaders had fewer options available to them with respect to managing miscreants and maintaining some sort of law and order, I suspect that most people today would agree that killing people is a bad thing and should not be condoned except under extraordinary circumstances. My friend and I then proceeded to try to list those circumstances. We started with self-defence or perhaps protecti...
1 comment
Read more

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo...
7 comments
Read more

Defending the BBC against Trump - an idea that might turn the tables and amuse the nation.

So President Trump wants to sue the BBC for damages related to 'harm' he believes he experienced as a result of some biased editing by the BBC around his speeches before and during the Jan 6th 2021 attack on the US Capitol. The law suit is being raised in Florida since the statute of limitation for libel in the UK is 12 months but up to 2 years in Florida. Apparently Trump wants to sue our Beeb for over $1bn. This is typical of the widely ambitious law suits he's filed many times before, but if he wins, which he rarely does, courts tend to settle for far less. It's all part of his tactics to scare the opposition into settling out of court rather than drag out very expensive 'lawfare', as it's known. Far from being able to afford $1bn if he's successful, the BBC probably can't even afford to defend itself using American lawyers, let alone the best of them. But the BBC is much loved by the British people, who own it. Attacking our precious institution,...
Post a Comment
Read more