Skip to main content

After Brexit

So it's June 24th and the UK has voted to leave the EU (I wrote this on the 20th). It's looking increasingly likely that the more the experts try to scare the public, the more the polls are showing that about half the public want to commit national suicide to teach those experts a lesson. "The more you tell me we need the EU, the more I want to prove you wrong" (even though I haven't a clue about the facts).

But I'm not going to 'scaremonger' here any more. Too late for that - although I suspect the horrendous murder of Jo Cox will have an impact. Who wants to associate themselves, however unfairly, with a psychotic xenophobe. It would be even more tragic if voters ignored Jo's impassioned final campaigning plea, to Remain. So winding the clock forward a few days and we've voted out, there's no way back. Cameron's referendum gamble has failed and he's allowed the country to vote itself into decline... The final curtain of the British Empire has closed. Just like the Romans, the Greeks, the Mongols, the Moors, the Holy Roman Empire, the Ottomans and the Persians before us. All were either defeated in war or faded away by the ebb and flow of global trade. We're currently entering the age of China. Trump won't Make America Great Again. He will screw it up even more. Move aside little nations (especially this one with less than 1% of the world's population). Make way for Mao's dream. The EU's no longer a threat to her ascendence now that our exit has weakened it.

So back to an isolated UK. What happens now? One of the first things we'll notice is that foreign financiers will cancel any plans they might have had, or been considering, to invest in the UK. Companies like BMW, Bank of America, HSBC, Morgan Stanley, Tata and Ford once upon a time invested in the UK because it was the easiest place to build factories and to populate offices in order to sell stuff into the EU. The best labour laws in the EU, easy to fund and incorporate businesses, plenty of lawyers and accountants to soak up your profits, relatively easy to get to (more runways would help), and most importantly, solid trading agreements with the rest of the EU as well as all the world's major economies. But with absolutely no guarantee that we will be allowed to sell into Europe at all without, at the very least, mountains of paperwork (tariffs apart) - a threat made this weekend in Der Spiegel by the German Finance Minister if we damage their EU by leaving - why would any business or sovereign fund put any money into a potentially ostracized UK? They would be mad to risk it even if one day we do miraculously manage to agree acceptable treaties with the EU again. Far wiser to build their factories and offices in countries who can guarantee full unfettered access to 500 million people, and growing.

So the first thing we will notice is immediate cancellation of inward investment.

Next, as has already been announced, will be an emergency budget. We've already been told it will be savage. It has to be because every economic adviser the Chancellor has at his disposal has told him that tax revenues will fall off a cliff. The pound will nosedive and the stock market will decline even further. Projects like HS2 and Trident will be cancelled. The world will ignore less than 1% of the global population sitting on a tiny island where our impact on tackling global warming and other environmental issues won't be missed either. We're not particularly important now. Outside the EU we'll be even less significant. Ask any foreigner in their own country what they think of the UK, and most will mention the Queen and very little else. We're a quirky little island off the coast of Europe with buckets of history and overflowing with hairdressers, lawyers and accountants. Good perhaps for amusing holidays, but not a lot else.

I have it on good authority from a senior member of a large financial institution that they have already decided to immediately move 1,000 jobs from London to Frankfurt if we leave. Why wait for the rush for office space and quality support staff? My own business has decided to move our HQ to within the EU. Sorry. Would love to remain a British company, but I don't believe we will have the same trading opportunities as a British company that we currently enjoy as an EU one. Why on earth would the owner of any company take the risk if they don't have to? Exactly what that will mean for our staff can be decided within the next two years. I resent needing to make this decision, and I anticipate there being many more factors to consider, but if my clients say we need to be European, I'd be crazy not to listen.

And then we'll try to 'close our borders'. What on Earth does that mean? We can't tell hundreds of thousands of foreign students to go away. They're one of our best export earners. Equally plenty of people come here on business and for holidays. How are we going to vet every single one as to whether they're going to leave at the end of their visa or not. And what about the three million EU citizens already here? I don't chance their luck against Farage's Black Shirts knocking on doors in the dead of night. By the way, we'll need to make room for the two million Brits enjoying retirements all over Europe as they become illegals (and why the hell weren't they allowed to vote in this charade?).

But one good thing will result from Brexit. Thousands of new jobs will have to be created by Whitehall to start the job of negotiating all those trading agreements not only with the EU but also the USA, China, India, Brazil and 78 other significant countries who only have treaties with the EU. Best estimate is that each one will take 7 to 10 years - if ever. More lawyers. Woopee.

Well done Baroness Farsi. Today she announced leaving Leave. She didn't want to side with the Xenophobes.

And one final point. He was born 'Farage' as in 'marriage' not as in 'large'. I have it on good authority from someone who used to work with his father Guy. So is he just pretentious, or does he want to sound more French so we won't think he's a Sun reader?


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Addictions. Porn, Drugs, Alcohol and Sex. Don't prevent it, make it safer.

In 1926 New York, during Prohibition, 1,200 people were poisoned by whiskey containing small quantities of wood alcohol (methanol). Around 400 died, the rest were blinded. The methanol they drank was in the moonshine they had bought illegally. In fact it had been added by law to industrial ethanol in order to make it undrinkable. Prohibition existed to protect everyone from the 'evils of the demon drink'. However, people still wanted to enjoy alcohol. So bootleggers bought cheap industrial alcohol and attempted to distill it to remove the impurities the state had added, but the process wasn't regulated. The state was inadvertently responsible for the suffering - although it was easy for them to blame the bootleggers and to justify escalating the war. This didn't stop the bootleggers. In fact it forced them to become more violent to protect their operations, and even less cautious about their production standards. Volumes of illicit alcohol, and therefore proportionat

The Secrets of Hacker Golf

Social media is awash with professional golfers selling video training courses to help you perfect your swing, gain 50 yards on your drive and cut your handicap. They might help a few desperate souls, but the rest of us hackers already know everything we need to complete a round of golf without worrying the handicap committee or appearing on a competition winner's list. What those pros don't realise is that for us hacking golfers who very occasionally hit shots that if you hadn't seen how they were hit, end up where the pros might have put them, we already know everything we need to know - and more. Unlike pros who know how to time the perfect swing in order to caress a ball 350 yards down the centre of a fairway, we hackers need to assemble a far wider set of skills and know-how to complete 18 holes, about which pros have no comprehension, need, or desire to learn. Here are some of them: Never select your shot until after you've hit it. A variation on this is to alway