Skip to main content

A New Political Party to Unite the UK and Lead the World

I started writing this before the decision by Theresa May to hold a 'snap general election'. Has anyone else noticed it will be held at the end of May? The urgency to create a new political movement uniting the principle of collaboration in the face of division has never been so great.

I've been a lifelong Conservative Party supporter. Or at least I was. I've always believed you need to earn money before you spend it, and that well regulated market forces will always trump (sic) state attempts to create wealth. I still believe in this, which is why any party who believes leaving the EU assists this objective is deceiving its citizens. It's irrelevant what the People SAY. They should never have been asked to make decisions in the first place. That's why we elect representatives. To make important and usual complex decisions for us. Not for us to tell them what to do. Democracy means everyone is represented, not a ruler.

The day after last year's Brexit referendum, I cancelled my funding of the party and resigned my membership. Perhaps I should have had the guts to resign before then, but like most people I know, I believed sense would prevail and 'The People' would listen to experts. Every expert! So I resigned because 'The People' should never have been asked a question they weren't competent to answer. It was also meant to be advisory, not a mandate. A further blunder was that for some mysterious reason, 2m British ex-pats living abroad were not allowed to vote. Including their votes (presuming turkeys wouldn't have voted for Christmas) would have changed the result.

So now 16m of us are called Remoaners because we all still passionately believe that it's madness to leave the EU. But I accept that the Leavers will have succeeded in at least one of their objectives... nobody outside the UK now wants to move here. Mission accomplished. We made the UK less attractive.

Unfortunately we've not only made it less attractive to hard-working, well-educated immigrants any economy should treasure and encourage to come, we've also made it less attractive to the other three tenets of the EU. Free movement of Goods, Services and Capital. Goods because the UK£ is falling like a stone (and has further to go when we eventually crash out without a trade deal in place), so importing anything we need (pharmaceuticals, technology, raw materials etc) will become increasingly painful. Services will dry up going either way. 'In' because we probably don't need other country's anyway, and 'Out' because we'll no longer have 'passporting rights' for financial services (every large bank has already announced pulling thousands of jobs out of London). And Capital because why would anyone want to invest in a declining economy with no connection to the world's largest market?

So May calls a general election while her main opponent, the Labour party is in disarray because of their own 'inconvenient' version of democracy where they elected (and then confirming with a second vote) a party leader who couldn't lead a government. Democracy is failing intellect worldwide it would appear. What she hopes will happen is that her party will win a greater majority than they already have. She claims this is to 'strengthen her hand' in the forthcoming negotiations with the EU (and the 53 other major trading nations with whom we will have no trading agreement once we've left in under two years time). What it really means is that many in her party desperately want what I want... the negotiations to fail and we give up trying to leave. Better still... predict that this will happen and save a lot of time, expense and pain (whilst removing uncertainty slowly destroying the economy) by rescinding our notice to quit the EU NOW - and at the risk of upsetting 17 million, but the relief of 7 billion (except maybe N Korea and Russia).

The problem for me is that no party offers me and nearly 17 million Brits (plus the 2 million ex-pats who will be allowed to vote this time) what we all desperately want to happen - a rescinding of Article 50. A cancelling of Brexit and to join forces with the rest of Europe, especially France it would seem, to amend the rules of the EU so we don't break it up. And the main issue is the free movement of people. Solve that one in a fair and sensible way, and it all settles down into a peaceful and thriving cooperative.

There is another possibility that works for all. Leavers, Remainers and the EU all get what they want.

The UK is deeply, and I mean really deeply divided. In all my life, I've never known my country (or more correctly, this collection of countries - more later) to be so angered on both sides of a debate about division and isolation versus unity and collaboration. It goes straight to the heart of the questions: What is a nation, and who should be responsible for its decisions?

The idea of a democracy is that everyone has an equal say in what we want the future to look like (except the young, prisoners and people who might live here but aren't defined as citizens). But that doesn't mean that 'the people' have to decide how it's achieved, and in particular issues they probably don't have the skills and understanding to make sensible decisions about that will achieve their ambitions. You don't ask the patient what the surgeon should do. But rather than dwell on why it was dangerous to ask voters to decide on something so complex, let's sum up by observing that Remainers had a pretty good understanding of what Remaining meant, but nobody knew what Leaving would mean. We still don't. A referendum was reckless.

That doesn't mean it won't work out well for the UK in the future, just that nobody, experts and voters alike, know. So rather than risk damage, sensible people and businesses in particular are taking action now to try to reduce that risk. That damage is becoming self-fulfilling irrespective of our skills in divorce negotiation.

The USA is still trying to work out what Trump means for their future. I think most are coming to the conclusion that he may improve things for some in the short-term, but not all for the long-term. That's what democracy does. It allows short-termists to win.


[note to reader. I started to draft this in 2017 before the last general election with a view to calling for a new centrist party dedicated to rescinding A50 and remaining part of the EU. Despite it being prescient in its predictions, I stopped writing it because I hadn't, and still haven't, worked out what that new party would look like in contrast to the extreme left wing Liberals and now the amorphous Independent Group (who stand for what?). I'm now publishing it unfinished to demonstrate that everything that has transpired was totally predictable (so blame Cameron and Farage) in the hope that we'll get clarity soon about what the Independent Group will stand for and whether the Libs will reach out to disaffected Tories like me.]


Popular posts from this blog

Phillips screws - yes I'm angry about them too

Don't get me wrong. They're a brilliant invention to assist automation and prevent screwdrivers from slipping off screw heads - damaging furniture, paintwork and fingers in the process. Interestingly they weren't invented by Mr Phillips at all, but by a John P Thompson who sold Mr P the idea after failing to commercialise it. Mr P, on the otherhand, quickly succeeded where Mr T had failed. Incredible isn't it. You don't just need a good idea, you need a great salesman and, more importantly, perfect timing to make a success out of something new. Actually, it would seem, he did two clever things (apart from buying the rights). He gave the invention to GM to trial. No-brainer #1. After it was adopted by the great GM, instead of trying to become their sole supplier of Phillips screws, he sold licenses to every other screw manufacturer in the world. A little of a lot is worth a great deal more than a lot of a little + vulnerability (watch out Apple!). My gromble is abo

Prepare for Alien Contact

I've not gone barking mad or joined some weird religious cult (aren't they all?). But I do predict that we will make contact with intelligences from other planets soon. Here's my reasoning: There are approximately 100,000,000,000 stars in our galaxy (easy way to remember this order of magnitude is it's one hundred, thousand, million). Usefully there are also approximately the same number of galaxies in the universe. And assuming every star has about the same number of planets orbiting it as our Sun, and that the Milky Way is an average size of galaxy, that means there are around 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets in the universe. A lot. Scientists have long debated the probability of life, as we would recognise it - reproducing, eating, etc - existing outside Earth. Most agree mathematically that it's a certainty. What they did was take all the components they believed were required for life to have evolved on Earth and then extrapolate what they know about

Introducing Product Relationship Management - it's what customers want.

Most businesses these days have Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems which store and process vasts amounts of information about us. They use this information to generate communications, amongst other things, which target us to buy their products and services. CRM is all about how a business relates to its customers: Past (keeping them loyal through aftersales and service), Present (helping them buy through bricks and clicks channels) and Future (prospecting). Most businesses will at some stage have declared themselves 'customer-centric'. They will probably have drawn diagrams on whiteboards that look something like these: But there's a problem with this whole approach of keeping the customer at the centre of your world and the focal point for everything you do. Is it what the customer wants ? Of course companies who ignore their customers eventually go out of business. And those who treat their customers well, tend to thrive. But is it really in the best inte